—Toni Muzi Falconi
One thing that never ceases to amaze me is how little our professional community is conscious and aware of the power of public relations (for the good and for the bad). We often complain that our profession is not sufficiently valued by our stakeholders, yet we are shocked when we experience that what we have to offer actually works (again, both for the good and for the bad).
Back in 1963, I was at 3M headquarters in St. Paul for a meeting of all international PR professionals. In walks just-retired, legendary founder William McKnight who asks, “John, who are all these guys here?” Senior Vice President of PR Worldwide, John Verstraete, replies, “These are all our PR people from around the world”. McKnight responds, “Well, I have one piece of advice for each of you: besides doing your good work for us, you should really focus on a world program of PR for PR in order to improve your license to operate.”
I am sure we all have scores of such memories. Eight years ago, Harold Burson spoke at an ICCO conference in Delhi and pleaded all professional associations to embark on a concerted global PR for PR program.
This is the challenge that the Global Alliance (67 associations from as many countries) accepted in 2009 following the approval of the Stockholm Accords program. Aware that many of us were ashamed of even calling the Accords effort a PR for PR program (as if this was less than appropriate), we decided to call the Accords a “brief” instead.
Personally, I attribute our hesitancy in coming to grips with the strong and often negative impact our profession bears on society and organizations to a number of intellectual and conceptual weaknesses. The first two that come to mind are:
- It was only in 1996 in Lisbon (34 years following the code of Athens) that the code provision by which PR remunerations and bonuses were barred from being linked to results was eliminated. This was relevant for all who believe that evaluation and measurement are an embedded part of the public relations process.
- We continue to this day to resist public regulation of our activities in protection of the public interest from the outside and have very ineffective, if any, implementation of our codes of conduct.
What I hope to be able to do—with the invaluable assistance of five excellent presenters—on Monday 19 November at 3:45 pm in room 312 at the World Public Relations Forum, is to prove that a number of individuals, consultancies, companies, associations and universities from all continents have indeed accepted the challenge by interpreting and adapting that brief to the public relations infrastructures of their territories. They have implemented the Accords and by Jove, it worked! Some examples include:
- The Italian tourism industry was the focus of a 14 month programmed and concerted outreach effort by Ferpi (the Italian Federation of Public Relations). Very recent results of a survey conducted by the industry amongst its own leadership showed that 86.7% of the 276 respondents claimed that the quality of relationships is essential for the growth and competitiveness of the tourism industry. To enhance the quality of these relationships, 57% believe that specific professional competencies are essential and 35% very important. They also attributed a 4.41 value (ranging from 0 to 5, with 5 being most valuable) to communication and relationship governance professional competency. Amongst the many professional roles attributed to the public relations profession the highest ranking is “to position tourism back into the country’s political agenda” (with a value of 4.37), followed by “promoting the offer to the market” (4.33), and “facilitating interactions with tourists before, during and after their experience” (4.32). While the first deals mostly with advocacy and public affairs, the second and third deal more with our consolidated practices. But listen: integrating internal and external outreach and facilitating the governance of relationships within the industry both came well before increasing media output and publicity!
- The Moldovan government is actively working to adapt and adopt recommendations from a research effort by an NYU Masters in Public Relations and Corporate Communication thesis dedicated to the Stockholm Accords. Based on the idea that the out-flow of Moldovan migrants is likely to continue in the future, public relations plays a crucial role in establishing and maintaining a process aimed at successfully managing these relationships. The process, centered on the idea that Moldovan migrants should be seen as an internal stakeholder, recognizes: (a) Moldovan migrants as a part of the network society; (b) Moldovan migrants have extensive value networks, both in Moldova and their host countries, and these networks can be used to gather and disseminate information; (c) Moldovan migrants are poised to be used as brand ambassadors that, when prompted, can act as advocates to internal and external publics.
- It is impossible to measure this at a global level, but we have evidence of at least 100 theses and research projects from graduate and undergraduate students dedicated to the Accords from the UK, South Africa, USA, Sweden and Italy alone.
- In South African universities the concept of stakeholder relationship management has restructured curricula, while the role of stakeholder relations officer has become significant in those 400 corporations listed in the Johannesburg exchange and need now to either comply or explain their integrated reporting procedures.
I sincerely hope that this effort, while coherently incorporating into the Accords the second phase of the GA project (the Melbourne Mandate, which will deal with organizational DNA, listening culture and our responsibilities to ourselves, our profession, our clients, our employers and society), will continue this implementation process. Because it is up to us—not anyone else—to shape the future of our profession.
More information can be found at www.worldprforum.com or the World Public Relations Forum can be followed on Twitter and Facebook.
About Toni Muzi Falconi
Toni Muzi Falconi, founding chair of the Global Alliance (2002-2003), is an Italian public relations professional and educator. He has 52 years of professional experience in various corporations (Exxon/Eni, 3M Company, Fabbri publishers) and consultancies (MF Communication, SCR, Shandwick, On-Off Interactive Solutions, Methodos).
He also has 20 years of teaching experience with IULM, Universities of Udine, of Bologna, Lumsa, Luiss, La Sapienza, New York. He coordinated the conception, process, editing, launch and implementation of the Stockholm Accords (www.stockholmaccords.org) for the GA from 2009 to the present day, and will be facilitating a session (Monday 19 at 3.45 room 213) titled ‘The Stockholm Accords: Achievements and challenges since 2010’ where five accords implementation cases will be presented by as many presenters from New York, Pretoria, Auckland, Toronto and Modena.